Food bank stirs controversy

This week Always Hope is playing with the big boys and girls, with my unexpected guest post on Lesley's blog. After putting a little plug for the Foodbank on this blog last week, I found myself drawn into a debate with Mike Rayner, who as it turns out, is a high-powered researcher and lobbyist who knows a thing or two about public policy. I won't attempt to summarise the debate, hop over and read it for yourself. But for what it's worth, I think Mike is right about everything except one - we can both attempt to change the system, and at the same time help people who are victims of the system. It's not an either/or.

Comments

Ray Barnes said…
Both points of view have great merit, but in my opinion they are not mutually exclusive. As you say, there is a time-lapse between applying for help and its being granted, if indeed it is granted. No-one should be allowed to slip through the holes in the net and if food banks can act as a safety net, they must be allowed to do so, and should be supported.
Interesting post.

Popular posts from this blog

Clergy need to have more in common

lessons from the Cornwall B&B case

Delia Knox - Miracles and healing, cynicism or wonder?