Gratuitous picture of Cheryl Cole to boost flagging circulation

Well, hey, if it works for the Church Times, maybe it'll work for this blog, too?

Some serious posts will follow soon, I promise.

Comments

Ray Barnes said…
Doesn't do anything for me Charlie. You do have female readers too.
February 5, 2011 at 10:38 AM
Charlie said…
Ah well. It was just a bit of a surprise to see her on the front of the CT - they tend to go for serious, worthy subjects or people in clerical robes. I wondered if it marks a change in editorial direction...
February 5, 2011 at 11:27 AM
Ray Barnes said…
You can "always Hope" I suppose, but perhaps you should read more than the front cover.
February 5, 2011 at 12:22 PM
Charlie said…
How dare you? I always read the CT from cover to cover, as all good clerics should. Anyway, there's another big picture of her in the middle (I kid you not).
February 5, 2011 at 5:12 PM
Vic Van Den Bergh said…
Excellent post Charlie - doesn't do anything for me but then neither does the CT (or CEN)!

Keep up the good work - always enjoy your blog.

Pax
February 5, 2011 at 11:56 PM
Anonymous said…
Didn't know who she was, and have been so busy in ministry I've not had time to read my CT yet. Thanks for pointing out who it is.
February 8, 2011 at 9:49 AM
Anonymous said…
Considering every single CT reader I've ever known is a subscriber and receives it by post, cover shots aren't particularly likely to make a difference to anything more than the sense of impending doom inherent in those about to open their copy.
February 8, 2011 at 11:35 AM
David Keen said…
Has she just been told she's going to be made a bishop? That should reverse the attendance trends. For a week or so.
February 9, 2011 at 10:38 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Delia Knox - Miracles and healing, cynicism or wonder?

Today the story of Delia Knox has jumped out of Christian subculture into the mainstream UK media, with this story on the Daily Mail website. Knox is filmed leaving her wheelchair after being prayed for at the Bay of the Holy Spirit Revival in Mobile, Alabama. Watch the 13 minute video embedded there, if you can. Most people will have one of two reactions to this: either you will be deeply moved, or you will find yourself overwhelmingly cynical about the whole thing. The second of the two seems to be the reaction of choice for Mail Online readers, who queue in droves in the comments section to pour scorn on the whole thing. Why are people sceptical about spiritual and miraculous healing? Mostly because they simply don't believe it. The prevailing secular atheist worldview has no slot available for this kind of thing - it simply doesn't happen (although a more thoughtful and informed atheist might allow for some kind of psychosomatic factor in healing). But even among those w...
Read more

let the vicar have a day off

I began writing this on Tuesday, my usual day off. Not normally a day when I would be hunched over the keyboard, but this week I had the time because I'm luxuriating in a whole week off. A perfectly usual experience, except in the case of vicars, when the idea of a "week off" becomes quite complex and problematic. Last week on Twitter I intercepted someone's tweet who had spotted a clergy friend who was enjoying an entertaining day out. His reply was along the lines of "blimey, what it is to be a vicar and live the life of Riley" etc. I have no complaint against this person, who is a good guy and obviously meant no harm. It was just a variant on the age-old witticism that every parish priest hears on a more or less weekly basis, "of course you only work on Sundays, don't you?" There are a few versions of this, my personal favourite being "not another holiday?" if one takes leave at any time within about a year of having previously d...
Read more

lessons from the Cornwall B&B case

Comment is called for on the judgement in the case of Peter and Hazelmary Bull , because it is a significant one, and because of the Cornish connection. While some of the responses have been predictable and stereotyped, most commentators have recognised that Judge Andrew Rutherford has treated the Bulls with respect, even though he has found against them. The case turned on the principle that Martyn Hall and Steven Preddy, as civil partners, were entitled to the same rights under law as a married couple. This meant that the Bull's argument that they would equally discriminate against an unmarried heterosexual couple was not accepted, because Hall and Preddy were, for the purposes of this case, married. This is a tricky one. The Bulls didn't really have a strong case, but it's difficult not to have sympathy for them. They come across in the media as a harmless couple just doing what seems right to them. It's also hard to shake off the sneaking suspicion that they have be...
Read more