Weird Lenten Twitter List

Thanks to Stuart at echurch Blog for drawing attention to Stephen Smith's list of what Twitterers gave up for Lent. Stephen, with techie skills beyond the comprehension of mere mortals, trawled Twitter between March 7th and 10th, aggregating all the tweets that referenced "giving up for Lent" and came up with a ranked list (as apparently he does every year). Here's the top 10 (with the number of occurences in brackets):

1. Twitter (4297)
2. Facebook (4060)
3. Chocolate (3185)
4. Swearing (2527)
5. Alcohol (2347) 
6. Sex (2093)
7. Soda (1959)
8. Lent (1493)
9. Meat (1352)
10. Fast food (1303)

There's serious intent here, but also sarcasm ("religion" also ranks at 14), and humour (147 people went for "lint"). Click on the link to see the top 100, and see what you think. But my reaction to this is more like a bronze age tribesman gazing at the stars and feeling very small.

We post things on Twitter and the like and imagine that we are being shrewd and funny. Perhaps we are, but let's not imagine we are in any way original. So you think you are clever, tweeting "I'm giving up sobriety for Lent" ? Well, 225 other people had the same idea, and it weighed in at a similar place on the list last year. There's nothing new under the sun, and each voice is one of a countless multitude, all saying much the same thing.

(Interestingly, one of the very few original entries this year seems to have been generated by Arsenal fans tweeting about giving up winning for Lent. What this tells us, I have no idea).

There's something curiously sobering, and very Lenten, about reading the list. It's not just the sense of shared observance (because most of the tweets are serious, not jocular). But the notion that we are each just a tiny drop in the ocean of humanity is quite humbling, and makes me want to give up opinions for Lent.

Comments

Ray Barnes said…
If you can give up opinions for lent you are superhuman.
Giging up expressing opinions might be a possibility (though not for me I hasten to add)
April 14, 2011 at 10:41 PM
Unknown said…
I am abstaining from abstention, and blogging. D'oh!
April 14, 2011 at 11:14 PM
Archdruid Eileen said…
The lesson we can learn from the Internet is that there truly is nothing new under the sun. It seems impossible to be truly original in a world of 6bn people.
April 20, 2011 at 8:27 AM
Charlie said…
I don't know, though. There can't be that many crazed Beaker Archdruids out there.
April 20, 2011 at 10:13 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Delia Knox - Miracles and healing, cynicism or wonder?

Today the story of Delia Knox has jumped out of Christian subculture into the mainstream UK media, with this story on the Daily Mail website. Knox is filmed leaving her wheelchair after being prayed for at the Bay of the Holy Spirit Revival in Mobile, Alabama. Watch the 13 minute video embedded there, if you can. Most people will have one of two reactions to this: either you will be deeply moved, or you will find yourself overwhelmingly cynical about the whole thing. The second of the two seems to be the reaction of choice for Mail Online readers, who queue in droves in the comments section to pour scorn on the whole thing. Why are people sceptical about spiritual and miraculous healing? Mostly because they simply don't believe it. The prevailing secular atheist worldview has no slot available for this kind of thing - it simply doesn't happen (although a more thoughtful and informed atheist might allow for some kind of psychosomatic factor in healing). But even among those w...
Read more

let the vicar have a day off

I began writing this on Tuesday, my usual day off. Not normally a day when I would be hunched over the keyboard, but this week I had the time because I'm luxuriating in a whole week off. A perfectly usual experience, except in the case of vicars, when the idea of a "week off" becomes quite complex and problematic. Last week on Twitter I intercepted someone's tweet who had spotted a clergy friend who was enjoying an entertaining day out. His reply was along the lines of "blimey, what it is to be a vicar and live the life of Riley" etc. I have no complaint against this person, who is a good guy and obviously meant no harm. It was just a variant on the age-old witticism that every parish priest hears on a more or less weekly basis, "of course you only work on Sundays, don't you?" There are a few versions of this, my personal favourite being "not another holiday?" if one takes leave at any time within about a year of having previously d...
Read more

lessons from the Cornwall B&B case

Comment is called for on the judgement in the case of Peter and Hazelmary Bull , because it is a significant one, and because of the Cornish connection. While some of the responses have been predictable and stereotyped, most commentators have recognised that Judge Andrew Rutherford has treated the Bulls with respect, even though he has found against them. The case turned on the principle that Martyn Hall and Steven Preddy, as civil partners, were entitled to the same rights under law as a married couple. This meant that the Bull's argument that they would equally discriminate against an unmarried heterosexual couple was not accepted, because Hall and Preddy were, for the purposes of this case, married. This is a tricky one. The Bulls didn't really have a strong case, but it's difficult not to have sympathy for them. They come across in the media as a harmless couple just doing what seems right to them. It's also hard to shake off the sneaking suspicion that they have be...
Read more