Back to Church Sunday - essential?

So today the C of E launches the sign-up for this year's Back to Church Sunday.   I wonder if any readers are among the three million who are "waiting for a friend to invite them"? (For the record, I believe this refers to a survey carried out a couple of years ago when people were asked if they would consider going to church if someone asked them to).  Or perhaps more likely, you are among those considering doing the asking.

Back to Church Sunday is a neat idea. There really are people out there who would consider coming to church if asked. Churchgoers get to interact with their unchurched or de-churched friends without having to talk about anything difficult like God, or their own personal faith - it's just a question of making the invitation.  But there are one or two cautions to considered before investing  Back to Church with the "essential" label, and seeing it as the panacea for all the church's ills.

The most obvious one is the question of what you are inviting people to come back to. There are all kinds of reasons why people don't go to church, or stop going. Unbelief or disinterest is only part of the story. In many cases it is painful experiences, unsympathetic rhetoric, irrelevance or just plain boredom that has driven them away. Unfortunately in the case of many of our churches there is a real risk that these people will return, only to find that nothing has changed. Of course the temptation is for churches to put on a special show that will convince the newcomer that this is the most lively/friendly/relevant church in the neighbourhood, but if this is just a whitewash, then it merely postpones the disappointment by a week. The question of what prompts people not just to come to church, but to stay, is very complex and a one-off invitation doesn't really address it at all.

"Back to Church" is no cure-all. But it would be very effective for churches that are actively trying to change to a more outward-looking way of doing things, used as part of a programme of outreach. That way, visitors will arrive at a church that is already set up for welcoming newcomers, and will be treated not just as exciting curiosities ("look, somebody different") but as potential new members of the community.

Comments

Avey said…
Hi,
are any stats around to show how effective this has been in producing regular attendance rather than a one off?

I agree it is a good initiative in principle, and the doors should always be open, but maybe the church needs to look at why they left and never came back...... I see lots of comments of how people came on a particular Sunday, but what about the rest of the year?
April 13, 2012 at 12:35 PM
Charlie said…
Dear Avey,
In a word, no.
I suspect there never will be either. B2CS will stand or fall on whether the churches using feel that it works.
April 13, 2012 at 1:23 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Delia Knox - Miracles and healing, cynicism or wonder?

Today the story of Delia Knox has jumped out of Christian subculture into the mainstream UK media, with this story on the Daily Mail website. Knox is filmed leaving her wheelchair after being prayed for at the Bay of the Holy Spirit Revival in Mobile, Alabama. Watch the 13 minute video embedded there, if you can. Most people will have one of two reactions to this: either you will be deeply moved, or you will find yourself overwhelmingly cynical about the whole thing. The second of the two seems to be the reaction of choice for Mail Online readers, who queue in droves in the comments section to pour scorn on the whole thing. Why are people sceptical about spiritual and miraculous healing? Mostly because they simply don't believe it. The prevailing secular atheist worldview has no slot available for this kind of thing - it simply doesn't happen (although a more thoughtful and informed atheist might allow for some kind of psychosomatic factor in healing). But even among those w...
Read more

let the vicar have a day off

I began writing this on Tuesday, my usual day off. Not normally a day when I would be hunched over the keyboard, but this week I had the time because I'm luxuriating in a whole week off. A perfectly usual experience, except in the case of vicars, when the idea of a "week off" becomes quite complex and problematic. Last week on Twitter I intercepted someone's tweet who had spotted a clergy friend who was enjoying an entertaining day out. His reply was along the lines of "blimey, what it is to be a vicar and live the life of Riley" etc. I have no complaint against this person, who is a good guy and obviously meant no harm. It was just a variant on the age-old witticism that every parish priest hears on a more or less weekly basis, "of course you only work on Sundays, don't you?" There are a few versions of this, my personal favourite being "not another holiday?" if one takes leave at any time within about a year of having previously d...
Read more

lessons from the Cornwall B&B case

Comment is called for on the judgement in the case of Peter and Hazelmary Bull , because it is a significant one, and because of the Cornish connection. While some of the responses have been predictable and stereotyped, most commentators have recognised that Judge Andrew Rutherford has treated the Bulls with respect, even though he has found against them. The case turned on the principle that Martyn Hall and Steven Preddy, as civil partners, were entitled to the same rights under law as a married couple. This meant that the Bull's argument that they would equally discriminate against an unmarried heterosexual couple was not accepted, because Hall and Preddy were, for the purposes of this case, married. This is a tricky one. The Bulls didn't really have a strong case, but it's difficult not to have sympathy for them. They come across in the media as a harmless couple just doing what seems right to them. It's also hard to shake off the sneaking suspicion that they have be...
Read more